requestId:68499ac30e1f12.27576373.
Why can “data-transformed Confucianism” be able to be able to be a success—Short-term maintenanceTrade agreement with Xu Yingjin
Author: Wu Genyou
Source: “Exploration and Contest” Issue 04, 2019
Time: Confucius was in the 2570s and April 12th of Ji HaiBaobaoSun Guichou
【Content Summary】
In response to the “Qin Zheng” of the data discipline that can be caused by large data theory, Xu Yingjin proposed that the “Zhou Zheng” of the Confucian small data theory can be used to conquer this danger, so that personal privacy can be better protected in the era of large data theory. According to Harari’s view, in the real era of data theory, “information is not restricted” will be the first principle, and living, uploading, and distributing friends will become the new method of preservation for people in the era of data theory. In the era of real data theory, a small number of data elites and political elites combined along the way will allow most “Homosa” to become real people and completely lose the meaning of life. A terrifying virtual instinct can be the real problem of the data theory era.
【Note】
The article taught by Xu Yingjin——”How to treat ConfucianismPrivacy QuestionsAdd to Privacy Questions—And to discuss the ability of “data-transformed Confucianism””[1], is a new and good article, whose intention is the most new point of view is that it will be in the market. The development of large data science is combined with Chen’s Confucianism, and the new concept of focusing on “small data” is proposed from the Confucian social thinking that emphasizes clans and small groups, so as to resolve the “differentiation” phenomenon of personal privacy damage that can appear. href=”https://twsugardaddy.org/”>Caring conditions. The article has a very inspiring meaning lies in the fact that the author calls Confucian thinking about clans and groups the form of “Zhouzheng” and the data-based specialized form implicit in “major data” as “Qinzheng”, and develops from these two fantasy forms that Max Weber said, “data-based Confucianism” and makes some inspiring and meaningful new ideas about the political thinking of traditional Confucianism. For example, the author has made a new explanation of the “well-field system” in the public and believes that the “original form” of the well-field system isThe confusion between “settlement private ownership” and “(small) family all system” is “actually a proper way to cooperate between private economic resources and public economic resources”, and it is not impossible to simply call it “primitive private ownership”. These new explanations about the “well-field system” taught by Xu Jie can definitely create new ideas.
Xu Qiong taught that the idea of determining the “Confucian small data theory” had a new inspirational meaning of the evaluation of the two parties in the “Salt and Iron Discussion” of Huan Xi of Western Han Dynasty, and the analysis of the political struggle between Ma Guang and Wang Anshi of the Northern Song Dynasty. He believed that: “From the perspective of data control rights, the “Salt Iron Discussion·This Promise” has a strong discussion on the fairness of the “equal transfer” and “level” reorganization left in the era of Emperor Wu, which is actually the most concentrated Confucian trial image from the hands of the central bureau. The idea of data control rights was returned. “The resistance of the “Confucian clan small data rights” held by Confucian scholars in Western Han Dynasty to the “large data rights” under the Qin political form was similar in the political struggle between Sima Guang and Wang Anshi in the Northern Song Dynasty. Moreover, through the development and application of the “Confucian clan small data theory” ideological resources, modern “major data theory” can lead to data violations on people’s privacy aggression.
The conclusion of Xu Jie’s teaching is that the political management of traditional Confucianism is obviously full of elite political colors, so it is not difficult to be misunderstood by some careless contemporary people as a smuggler of the unique tailoring. However, according to the major threads of the game between “Zhou Zheng” and “Qin Zheng” sorted out in this article, as the protector of data resources in the foreign country, Confucianism can prevent a certain type of decent authority based on imperial laws and regulations by implementing a certain type of flexible authority based on morality within a small scale.
As far as the readers read today, it seems that no one has found that someone can combine the new problem of “big data” with Chen’s Confucianism, and hopes to explore the justice elements in Confucianism to avoid or harm the “big data theory” to the privacy of modern people. This very new approach can not only allow Confucianism to continue to maintain dialogue with the new era, but also develop Confucian thinking under the conditions of the new era, but also allow large data, as well as the damage to personal privacy caused by large data, to provide a philosophical reflection and suggestions. From the perspective of the personal reading experience of the author, Xu Wei taught the “Zhou Government” form and “Qin Government” form in data, and to maintain a vigilance and resistance towards the “Qin Government” form in data, and then defend the “Zhou Government” form in data, so as to maintain personal privacy and the data rights of the small group, and thus to carry out the data specialization that can be brought by the major data theory. The purpose of this political thinking about data is to defend the people and oppose specialization, but what is defended is the people’s doctrine and opposesData specialization. According to the principle, the authors of this thinking and purpose also agree, because in modern society, no one can protect the discipline and oppose the civil servants. The civilian, as the value of modernity, is a basic value of the whole human race, and is the basic political consensus or political civilization consensus of modern people. However, Xu Jie taught that the modern interpretation of a series of problems in traditional society was to conceal some historical facts from the perspective of modern people, and that the understanding of Wang Anshi’s rituals would lead to new conflicts. Relying on the modern data illusionist fantasy in the Confucian fantasy form of “Zhou Zheng” is a sudden look at the various persecutions and ills brought by the power and clanism of the Chinese traditional society since Qin and Han. Under the principle of determining the basic initiative of Xu Jie’s article, the author raised some doubts about some of his specific opinions in order to deepen his understanding of large data science and a series of social effects that will be induced.
Based on the thinking methods of large data and the academic value presented by Xu Wen
The needs of the authors have not conducted professional research on modern large data phenomena, but have only understood some basic knowledge of large data from some journals, such as the large data in the “clear city” and the application of large data in the modern medical treatment process. And the understanding of the new “major data theory” energy phenomenon still remains in the ordinary level of awareness. In the view of writers, the emergence of large data phenomena is important to be a form of thinking caused by the growth of information processing capacity after the rapid development of modern computer technology. Through the possession and processing of massive information, we find the most fair thinking or path to solve the problem. The basic thinking method is based on logical analysis of the emotional thinking method. Generally speaking, large data has five characteristics such as volume, fast velocity, variety, low value density, and veracity, and is called the “5V” characteristics of large data. [2] For example, in modern urban road conditions governance, large data has a certain positive effect on the solution of road conditions. Through the processing of keywords, unexpected positive effects can also be discovered in humanities and social science research. The method of applying large data to deal with problems is based on the judgment of quantity, and the judgment of quality is determined by the amount of quantity. Quantity can certainly reflect quality, but the processing form of quantity can often cover the judgment of quality. Therefore, the “algorithm” related to data processing affects the judgment of application data on the properties of things at a relatively large level. If it is based onlyData conclusions based on an “algorithm” are often three-dimensional, and this problem exists in some popular university ranking systems in the market. If we want to correctly and comprehensively understand the nature of a certain thing and draw conclusions that approximate the nature of a thing, we can use multipl
發佈留言